Denying a child the right to prefer Anticipatory Bail through Section 438 of CrPC violative of Article 14: Bombay High Court
Written by Vidisha Mathur In the case of Raman Mundhe s/o Prakash Mundhe and Another v State of Maharashtra before the Bombay High Court, the Bench constituted by Justice S.V. Kotwal and Justice B.P. Deshpande observed that the Juvenile Justice Act had no
Interim Bail Granted To 13 Prisoners Who Were Languishing in Jail For 14-22 Years Despite Proving Juvenility By Supreme Court
The plea submitted that in spite of all the petitioners being juveniles as has been held by the Juvenile Justice Board, the State of Uttar Pradesh had failed to take any steps for their release. They also highlighted that according to the Juvenile