“Sending Photograph Of Summons Through WhatsApp Not Overreach Of Judicial System”: Delhi High Court
Written By – Radhika In the case of ICICI BANK LIMITED v. RASHMI SHARMA, the Delhi High Court has set aside an order passed by a Commercial Court to the extent of issuing a show cause notice of criminal contempt after a plaintiff
Consent Of Accused Not Required To Obtain Voice Sample; No Violation of Fundamental Rights: Kerala HC
Written By – Aishwarya Justice R. Narayana Pisharadi (Mahesh Lal N.Y v. State of Kerala) dismissed a petition alleging that the accused was not given an opportunity of being heard before being directed to produce his voice sample, and held that the accused
[Virtual Hearings] May have to ban lawyers appearing through mobile phones: CJI NV Ramana
Written By – Dakshita Dubey Recently in a virtual hearing set up the Supreme Court bench, comprising of CJI NV Ramanna, expressed their frustration on lawyers attending Court Proceedings through their mobile phones, which makes them prone to network glitches and wastes time
Wife Making Serious Unproved Allegations Of Criminal Conduct Against Husband Constitutes ‘Cruelty’: Delhi High Court
Written By – Aishwarya The Division Bench of Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Jasmeet Singh thus upheld the divorce decree granted to the husband by a Family Court and dismissed the wife’s appeal under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act. The Family
Section 30 of the Advocates Act will entitle the Advocate to have the right to represent the parties under the tribunal: Delhi HC
Justice Prathiba Singh relied on a division bench judgement of the Kerala High Court and opined that since Section 17 has been declared ultra vires Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961, it would obviously mean that an advocate would have the right
498A IPC Case: “Her Behaviour Does Not Appear To Be Normal In First Blush”: Delhi High Court.
The Delhi High Court has granted interim custody of a woman to her father after observing that her behavior appears abnormal and has suffered partial loss of memory and speech after allegedly being mentally and physically tortured by her husband and in-laws.
Delhi HC seeks response from directors of “Nyay: The Justice” after watching the film
Advocate Harish Salve, representing Krishna Kishore Singh, argued that Lapalap was an obscure website and that releasing the movie here meant that the damage was substantially limited but cautioned that the same must not be allowed to escalate basing his arguments on the
Accused in Delhi Riots to remain on Bail, High Court’s order not to be treated as precedent
Supreme Court upheld the Delhi HC court's bail application order in Delhi Riots 2020.
This is a George Floyd Moment for citizens of this country: Delhi High Court
The court held that the notification dated 03-05-2021 is in violation of Article 14 of the constitution as the “state cannot exclude a set of persons who would ordinarily fall within the exempted class by creating an artificial, unreasonable, and substantially unsustainable distinction”.
Interim Relief for Salman Khan’s Radhe: Delhi High Court orders blanket protection against Piracy.
A suit was filled when the plaintiff received the information that the film "Radhe: Your Most Wanted Bhai" was a victim of rampant piracy through social media platforms including messaging app 'Whatsapp'.
