Jharkhand High Court Grants Interim Bail, Affirms Judicial Vigilance Over Liberty Rights
The Jharkhand High Court has granted interim bail to an accused who was in transit remand following an arrest by the Jharkhand Police in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi presided over the case and determined that releasing the petitioner on interim
Google Challenges Rs. 2 Crore Claim Over YouTube Account Termination in Court
Google Inc. opposed a petition filed by M/S String Art Private Limited, seeking damages worth Rs. 2 crore for the termination of its YouTube accounts, allegedly after a video against Microsoft CEO Bill Gates was posted on its channel. String Art claims to
“The Division Bench cannot remand the matter back to the single Judge under Article 226 of the Constitution”: Karnataka HC
Recently, the Karnataka High Court while hearing an intra-court appeal, observed that the single bench is not subordinate to the division bench of the high court and that it cannot remand the matter back to the single Judge in the exercise of its
Article 226 | If there are serious substantive disputes, the High Court should refer the parties to alternate remedies: High Court
Issue: The High court recently held that when there are significant factual disputes, the High Court should refer the parties to alternate remedies. Facts of the Case: A disagreement emerged over the custody of excess land proclaimed by the Competent Authority in 1977
Bilkis Bano case| Convicts questioned Supreme Court’s Jurisdiction regarding power of Remission, raising issues Concerning Art. 32 and 226
The Indian Supreme Court is immersed in a difficult discussion over jurisdiction and the scope of constitutional power in the case of the prisoners connected to the horrifying Bilkis Bano event of 2002, which has riveted the attention of the whole country. The
“Permit her to live her own life”: Gujarat HC directed parents of 18 year old girl not to harass her.
We appreciate the decision of Divyaben an 18-year-old girl, which in the opinion of the court, is a mature decision. We hope and trust that as parents, the petitioner and Nishaben would respect the feelings of their child and permit her to live
