Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SLC Reads

Kite-flying is part of our culture and heritage, can’t pass orders banning it: Delhi High Court.

Socio Legal Corp

Last Updated on October 4, 2022 by Administrator

Written By Pretika Tiwari

[Sanser Pal Singh vs. Union of India and Ors.]

The Delhi High Court had recently observed that the Court could not impose an order prohibiting kite flying because it is a part of our culture and tradition. However, the bench comprising of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad stated that the use of Chinese manjha (synthetic thread) is a severe concern, and the State has been ordered to strictly abide by the National Green Tribunal’s (NGT) ruling and a Delhi government notification order banning it.

The Court was hearing a PIL filed before the Court requesting the imposition of a complete ban on the use of Chinese manjha in the national capital. The petitioner claimed that the use of Chinese manjha, which also injured birds and animals, was to blame for a significant number of incidents in and around Delhi. Advocate Sanser Pal Singh argued for a complete prohibition on the manufacture, storage, and transportation of kites as well as all other items related to kite flying. Counsel representing the Central and State Governments submitted before the Court that a notification was issued in 2017 outlawing the use of Chinese manjha and other comparable materials and that a monitoring committee had also been established to look into the issue. Additionally, it was mentioned that the NGT had issued a motion in September 2020 banning the production, distribution, storage, acquisition, and use of nylon or other synthetic, non-biodegradable thread for kite-making. The police added that anybody found to be breaking the NGT order and the government notification is the subject of FIRs.

After hearing both parties, the Court dismissed the petition and instructed the relevant authorities to uphold the NGT order and the government’s notification strictly.

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

High Court

It was opined by the larger bench that it can be a violation of the fair trial as the accused is presumed innocent until...

High Court

When the presumption is raised under section 113-A, the prosecution must show that there was cruelty and continuous harassment.

High Court

The Calcutta High Court directs the CBI to investigate offensive social media comments about the victim in the RG Kar rape-murder case, with cooperation...

High Court

Madras High Court confirms conviction in sports sexual harassment case, directs a series of protective measures for woman athletes. A safe environment, says the...