Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Supreme Court

Jammu and Kashmir High Court directs LCMA not to harass tea sellers on Dal Lake market

Last Updated on June 14, 2024 by News Desk

The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh recently directed the Jammu and Kashmir Land Conservation and Management Authority (LCMA), Srinagar not to create unnecessary disturbance in the business by harassing the tea sellers at the floating market of Dal lake, Srinagar. 

The petition was filed by the partners of the Zabarwan Tea Stall at Dal lake’s floating market seeking direction from this court to the respondents not to harass the petitioners in running their business. 

The petitioners claimed that the LCMA’s officials were frequently visiting the tea stall and harassing them, thereby hindering the smooth running of their business even when they are holding valid licences. 

The court in the order of 29 may, 2024 observed that there is no reason to harass vendors having valid licences.

The court said, “We see no reason why any impediment be created to any person, who is running business after obtaining necessary licence and, as such, we dispose of this petition with the observation that if the petitioners are running the business of selling tea on the basis of the valid licence, the officials of respondent no.1 shall not create unnecessary disturbance in the business.”

The court also observed that the authority would be at liberty to verify the validity or genuineness of the licence. 

If any and to proceed in the matter in accordance with law and if petitioners are found running the business without any valid licence or documents, the concerned authority shall be free to proceed in accordance with law.” The order stated. 

Hence, the court disposed of the petition. 

Case title- M/s Zabarwan Tea Stall v. Vice Chairman, J&K LCMA

written by Shagun Behal

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

District Court

Last Updated on September 16, 2024 by Athi Venkatesh The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) ruled in favor of Hyundai Motors Ltd....

Supreme Court

The order of the Bombay HC that directed the registration of an F.I.R. on the allegations of fraud was stayed by the SC.

High Court

Dermatologists have moved Bombay High Court against guidelines that permitted dentists to undertake hair transplantation. PIL cites risk to patient safety and not enough...

High Court

The Bombay High Court has recently denied anticipatory bail to a man, highlighting the negative impact of increasing unauthorized construction projects on public infrastructure.