February 23, 2025
Supreme Court Considers CBI Probe into Unauthorized Construction in Chandni Chowk
Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers CBI Probe into Unauthorized Construction in Chandni Chowk

Feb 18, 2025

Last Updated on February 18, 2025 by Shianjany Pradhan

The Supreme Court on Tuesday hinted at the possibility of directing a CBI probe for looking into allegations of unauthorized commercial constructions in Chandni Chowk, Delhi.

The Court also questioned the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) over its apparent failure to take adequate action against such developments.

The MCD’s counsel argued that unauthorized constructions had already been removed as per the Delhi High Court’s directives, and that a report from the Court Commissioner was available.

However, Justice Kant raised concerns, questioning whether the Corporation was being influenced by builders.

The counsel further defended the MCD’s actions, stating that demolition and sealing orders had been issued.

However, Justice Kant criticized the timing of the Corporation’s actions, remarking that authorities only react when a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed.

It was Responded to by the MCD’s representative clarified that the High Court’s decision was not solely based on the Corporation’s claims, and that photographic evidence had been submitted to reflect the current status of the site.

Despite this, the Supreme Court adjourned the matter for a week, instructing the MCD to justify why a deeper probe should not be ordered.

Justice Kant emphasized that the issue required not only a site inspection by experts but also an examination of the Corporation’s role in permitting unauthorized constructions.

The Court directed the MCD to explain why a more extensive investigation should not be conducted, given the apparent external influences affecting regulatory decisions.

Additionally, the bench—comprising Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh—ordered the petitioners to ensure notices were served to all unserved respondents before any orders could be passed.

The Court also instructed the petitioners to suggest names of independent experts, such as architects and engineers, who could be part of a Committee to inspect the site before any decision on a CBI inquiry.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.