Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Supreme Court

Six years on, Delhi High Court accepts CBI’s appeal against A Raja and others’ acquittal in 2G spectrum case

Last Updated on March 22, 2024 by News Desk

On Friday, the Delhi High Court accepted the appeal submitted by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) regarding the exoneration of A Raja, K Kanimozhi, and 15 other prominent figures, including politicians, businessmen, and bureaucrats, in the 2G spectrum allocation cases.

Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma granted CBI’s “leave to appeal” against acquitting 17 accused in the 2G case. “Leave to appeal” is formal permission to challenge a court’s decision before a higher court.

It was added by him that arguable points were made by the CBI whereby the grant of leave was converted to appeal.

The order was reserved on 14th March , 2024, and  the same has been done 6 years and 125 listings later.

The matter was earlier heard by a bench of 7 judges before coming to Justice Sharma.

In December 2017, a Special CBI Court acquitted Raja, Kanimozhi, and 15 others accused of causing losses to the state exchequer by undercharging telecom firms for frequency licenses. The Comptroller and Auditor General of India estimated the total loss to be ₹1.76 trillion.

The accused in the case include Telecom Secretary Siddharth Behura, Raja’s private secretary RK Chandolia, Swan Telecom promoters Shahid Usman Balwa and Vinod Goenka, Unitech MD D Sanjay Chandra, and three top executives of Reliance Group – Gautam Doshi, Surendra Pipara and Hari Nair.

In 2012, the Supreme Court cancelled 122 telecom licenses and spectrum allocated to 9 companies due to a faulty allocation process. In March 2018, the CBI challenged the acquittal of all accused in the High Court. The agency argued that the trial court judgment has inconsistencies and the High Court should hear the appeal.

Written By:- Shianjany Pradhan (@SHIANJANYPRADHAN)

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

High Court

It was opined by the larger bench that it can be a violation of the fair trial as the accused is presumed innocent until...

High Court

When the presumption is raised under section 113-A, the prosecution must show that there was cruelty and continuous harassment.

High Court

The Calcutta High Court directs the CBI to investigate offensive social media comments about the victim in the RG Kar rape-murder case, with cooperation...

High Court

Madras High Court confirms conviction in sports sexual harassment case, directs a series of protective measures for woman athletes. A safe environment, says the...