Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Supreme Court

Delhi High Court requests Sports Ministry response to Wrestling Federation of India's appeal against suspension

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hearing Alimony In Void Marriage Under Hindu Marriage Act 1955.

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Halts Gujarat HC’s Demand For Fresh Apology From Newspapers Over Misreporting

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Asks NMC To Reassess MBBS Admission Rules For "PwD Candidates"

Supreme Court

Supreme Court says, "It depends on the welfare of the child, whether or not custody can be refused to the child's natural parents."

Supreme Court

The custody rights of natural parents can be overruled for the child's welfare.  "Says SC

Supreme Court

Supreme Court stayed the central government's decision to omit Rule 170

Supreme Court

Supreme Court to Address Alimony Entitlement in Void Marriages Under Hindu Marriage Act

Supreme Court

Supreme Court to Decide on Alimony in Cases of Void Marriages Under Hindu Marriage Act

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs PVR INOX to CESTAT in ₹17 Crore Service Tax Dispute

Supreme Court

Delhi High Court requests Sports Ministry response to Wrestling Federation of India’s appeal against suspension

Published

Last Updated on April 11, 2024 by News Desk

On 9th April, the Delhi HC sought the Centre’s response to a plea filed by the Wrestling Federation of India, whereby the suspension was challenged.

The notice was issued by Justice Subramonium Prasad, to the Union Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports for filing the reply to the petition within 4 weeks.

The Central government suspended the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) after Sanjay Singh won the elections, citing concerns over hasty decisions and rule violations. The Sports Ministry directed the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) to manage WFI’s affairs.

The IOA dissolved the ad-hoc committee later. Senior Advocate Dayan Krishnan argued that the suspension violated natural justice principles and the National Sports Development Code of India, 2011, as no prior notice was given.

Written By:- Shianjany Pradhan (@SHIANJANYRPADHAN)

In this article:, ,
Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Punjab And Haryana High Court Punjab And Haryana High Court

High Court

Mere possession of mobile phones is not a ground to cancel parole.

It was opined by the larger bench that it can be a violation of the fair trial as the accused is presumed innocent until...

16 hours ago

High Court

No automatic application of presumption under 113-A if the wife dies within 7 years of marriage.

When the presumption is raised under section 113-A, the prosecution must show that there was cruelty and continuous harassment.

16 hours ago

High Court

Calcutta High Court Directs CBI to Probe Objectionable Comments in RG Kar Rape-Murder Case

The Calcutta High Court directs the CBI to investigate offensive social media comments about the victim in the RG Kar rape-murder case, with cooperation...

2 days ago
Madras High Court Madras High Court

High Court

Madras High Court Upholds Conviction in Sports Sexual Harassment Case, Issues Directives to Protect Female Athletes

Madras High Court confirms conviction in sports sexual harassment case, directs a series of protective measures for woman athletes. A safe environment, says the...

2 days ago