Punjab & Haryana High Court Allows Withdrawal of PIL Challenging Gallantry Awards for Officers Accused of Excessive Force During Farmers’ Agitation
Last Updated on August 12, 2024 by News Desk
A recent development in the Punjab and Haryana High Court involved a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging a Haryana Government notification that recommended gallantry awards for six police officers who were stationed at the Shambhu border during the farmers’ agitation. The PIL, filed by the organization Lawyers for Humanity, accused these officers of committing atrocities against farmers during the protest and argued that such behavior should not be rewarded with gallantry awards, which are traditionally given to those who demonstrate bravery in defending the nation against anti-national elements.
The court, consisting of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Anil Kshetarpal, noted that the gallantry awards had not yet been officially announced. The Additional Solicitor General (ASG), Satya Pal Jain, representing the Central Government, informed the court that the Haryana Government’s recommendations for these awards had been sent back for further consideration and opinion.
In light of this information, the court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the PIL but granted them the liberty to return to the court if a cause arises in the future. The bench’s decision was based on the fact that, since the awards had not been announced, there was no immediate action required.
The PIL highlighted concerns that rewarding officers accused of using excessive force against citizens would set a dangerous precedent. The petition argued that gallantry awards are intended for those who protect the country and its people, not for those who allegedly harm innocent citizens. By allowing the withdrawal of the PIL, the court left the door open for further legal action if the situation evolves.
The case underscores the ongoing tensions and legal battles surrounding the treatment of protesters and the actions of law enforcement during the farmers’ agitation, reflecting broader concerns about the appropriate use of state power and the recognition of police conduct.
Written by — Athi Venkatesh AVD
