Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Judiciary

Journalist’s complaint against actor Salman Khan quashed.

Last Updated on April 1, 2023 by Administrator

A journalist filed a criminal complaint against actor Salman khan alleging criminal intimidation in the year 2019. The metropolitan court of Andheri had before issued a summons to the act and this got challenged in the High court. It was inquired by Justice Bharati Dhangre whether the right process was followed or not.

The background of the case is that the journalist Ashok Pandey had alleged that his phone was snatched from Salman khan when the journalists were clicking his picture while cycling. He alleged that the actor had threatened and argued with him.

The investigation was ordered by the magistrate under sections 202 and 204 of the crpc. The actor as well as his bodyguard who is also an accused in this case then challenged the order in the high court.

Later some improvements were made in the complaint of the journalist to which it was said by Justice Revati Mohite Dere, while staying the summons that, being a journalist, the right statements could have been submitted in the first go.

Mr. Pandey’s advocate said that the affidavit was given by the complainant to the court which shows that the compliance to section 202 has been done and the offense has been made out based on the merits.

When the matter was being heard, Justice Revati told him that the privacy of the people should be respected, so if Salman khan is not above the law the same should be for the journalists.

Though the police report mentioned that the cases under the said offenses have been made, the same has been verified and accepted by Justice Revati and the complaint was quashed by the court.  

Written by:- Shianjany Pradhan

Written By

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. simiriti pandey

    December 27, 2023 at 8:33 AM

    The recent decision by the High Court on the Salman Khan case highlights a significant point about respecting privacy and the responsible exercise of journalism. 🤔 It’s interesting to see how the court balanced the rights of the individual against the freedom of the press. 📰⚖️ This ruling could set an important precedent for future cases involving celebrities and media interactions. It’s crucial that both parties, celebrities and journalists, adhere to legal and ethical standards. 👏🏽 #JusticePrevails #MediaEthics 🎥📚

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

High Court

It was opined by the larger bench that it can be a violation of the fair trial as the accused is presumed innocent until...

High Court

When the presumption is raised under section 113-A, the prosecution must show that there was cruelty and continuous harassment.

High Court

The Calcutta High Court directs the CBI to investigate offensive social media comments about the victim in the RG Kar rape-murder case, with cooperation...

High Court

Madras High Court confirms conviction in sports sexual harassment case, directs a series of protective measures for woman athletes. A safe environment, says the...