Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

High Court

Delhi High Court Urges Government to Address Legal Gap in Sexual Offense Laws

The Delhi High Court urged the Central government to address the lack of provisions for punishing non-consensual sodomy in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The court emphasized the need to fill this legal gap, stating that non-consensual sexual acts must be punishable, and urged the government to take action within six months.

Delhi High Court

Last Updated on August 28, 2024 by Athi Venkatesh

The Delhi High Court has directed the Central Government to swiftly decide on including a provision to penalize non-consensual sodomy and other ‘unnatural’ sexual acts under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The court’s directive came in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the lack of an equivalent provision to Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in the new criminal laws.

The Bench, consisting of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, had previously asked the government’s counsel to seek instructions regarding this issue. Central Government Standing Counsel (CGSC) Anurag Ahluwalia informed the court that the matter was under active consideration, with a holistic review expected.

The court criticized the absence of penal provisions for non-consensual sexual acts, emphasizing that such legal gaps cannot be ignored. The judges expressed concern about the potential consequences of leaving such offenses unaddressed in the statute books.

The court highlighted the urgency of the matter and suggested that if necessary, the government could issue an ordinance. The Bench instructed the government to treat the PIL as a formal representation and to make a decision “as expeditiously as possible, preferably within six months.”

Previously, Section 377 of the IPC, which was repealed in July with the enactment of the BNS, criminalized non-consensual sexual acts, including carnal intercourse “against the order of nature.” The Supreme Court’s Navtej Singh Johar judgment in 2018 had decriminalized consensual sexual acts but maintained provisions for non-consensual acts and offenses involving minors.

Advocate Gantavya Gulati, who filed the PIL, argued that the repeal of Section 377 IPC without an equivalent provision in the BNS creates a legal void. Gulati urged the court to mandate the Union of India to amend the BNS to include explicit provisions criminalizing non-consensual sexual acts, emphasizing the need to protect fundamental rights and public safety.

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

District Court

Last Updated on September 16, 2024 by Athi Venkatesh The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) ruled in favor of Hyundai Motors Ltd....

Supreme Court

The order of the Bombay HC that directed the registration of an F.I.R. on the allegations of fraud was stayed by the SC.

High Court

Dermatologists have moved Bombay High Court against guidelines that permitted dentists to undertake hair transplantation. PIL cites risk to patient safety and not enough...

High Court

The Bombay High Court has recently denied anticipatory bail to a man, highlighting the negative impact of increasing unauthorized construction projects on public infrastructure.