Allahabad High Court Orders Advocates and Administrators to Stay Away from Temple Management
Last Updated on September 2, 2024 by Athi Venkatesh
The Allahabad High Court has ruled that advocates and district administrators should no longer manage temples, particularly in Mathura. This decision arose from a contempt application related to a temple dispute in Mathura, where 197 civil suits concerning temples are currently pending.
Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal expressed concern that temples and religious trusts, if managed by outsiders, could erode public faith. He emphasized that only those with a religious background and knowledge of the Vedas and Shastras should oversee temple management. The court stressed the need for temple receivers to be genuinely connected to religious practices rather than using the position for personal gain.
The court criticized the common practice of appointing Mathura’s practicing advocates as temple receivers, which often leads to prolonged litigation. According to the court, these advocates tend to delay the resolution of disputes to maintain control over temple administration. Justice Agarwal pointed out that this practice has become a status symbol rather than an effective solution for managing temples.
The court urged the District Judge of Mathura to ensure that civil disputes related to temples are resolved quickly, without unnecessary involvement from advocates and district administration. The judgment, dated August 27, highlighted the negative impact of prolonged litigation on temple management and called for immediate corrective actions to protect the interests of devotees.
By distancing advocates and administrators from temple management, the court aims to preserve the sanctity and integrity of these religious institutions. The decision marks a significant step towards ensuring that temple administration aligns with religious values and practices, free from external influences.
Written by — Athi Venkatesh AVD
