SC recently expressed surprise at the proposal’s 128-page summary
Last Updated on December 18, 2024 by NewsDesk SLC
The Supreme Court recently expressed surprise at the proposal’s 128-page summary. Given that the motion was filed by the participant personally, the court stated that the filing office should have suggested that the participant submit a summary.
“The appellant, who appeared in person, filed a 128-page brief, packed with details, many of which are irrelevant for our purposes. We understand that the appellant is not a trained lawyer, but he is on the register.” asked the petitioner to shorten the synopsis Synopsis cannot be 128 pages!,” said Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah.
The appellant approached the Supreme Court against the order of the Allahabad High Court which restored the original number to the appellant’s suit under Section 125 CPC and directed the Family Court to decide the matter in accordance with law. “We see absolutely no reason why we should interfere with the above impugned order.
The said order is in favor of the complainant and moreover it only ordered the matter to be reheard before the Agra Family Court, which the family court had earlier rejected,” he added. he said. Agra for non-prosecution The applicant, instead of appearing before the Family Court, Agra directly challenged this order of the High Court in this Court, which in our opinion is not correct,” the Supreme Court said.
Case : Deepti Sharma v. State of Uttar Pradesh
