Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Supreme Court

Sharing Google PIN as a condition for bail violates right to privacy: SC

Last Updated on July 8, 2024 by News Desk

An appeal was filed against the conditions that were imposed by the Delhi HC, whereby the Nigerian national, Frank Vitus was granted bail, who was a accused in a drugs case

The bench comprised of Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan.

The bench had directed on a previous hearing, for Google India to explain the pin-sharing feature and how does access to location works through Google Maps.

The court remarked that making it a condition for the bail will hit the right to privacy guaranteed under Article 21.

The court said that the conditions for the bail cannot be ‘fanciful, arbitrary or freaking’

It said that the technology can’t be used to keep a constant vigil on anyone.

Also, the feature does not enable real-time tracking which makes it all the more redundant.

It was ruled by the SC on Monday that it is not allowed for the courts to give an order, directing the accused to share his Google PIN with the authorities and make it a condition for the bail.

Written By:- Shianjany Pradhan (@SHIANJANYPRADHAN)

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

Supreme Court

The Supreme Court recently denied a tenant's claim to ownership of the property based on a settlement with the landlord, holding that no transfer...

District Court

Last Updated on September 16, 2024 by Athi Venkatesh The Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (SCDRC) ruled in favor of Hyundai Motors Ltd....

Supreme Court

In a case brought by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) about corruption charges related to the since-canceled Delhi excise policy for 2021–2022, the...

Supreme Court

The order of the Bombay HC that directed the registration of an F.I.R. on the allegations of fraud was stayed by the SC.