Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Supreme Court

A plea filed challenging the bar on unmarried women to avail surrogacy benefits: SC seeks response form center

Last Updated on December 6, 2023 by News Desk

Issue:- A plea was filed that challenged various regulations under the Surrogacy Act of 2021 and the Surrogacy Rules 2022, which had excluded unmarried women from availing the option of having children through surrogacy.

Analysis – A bench comprised of Justice B.V Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan issued a notice concerning the plea.

The petition was filed by a practicing lawyer, whereby she had argued that she possessed the right to reproduction and motherhood even without being married.

It was pointed out in the plea that the SC through various decision have emphasized the right of reproduction as well as motherhood.

She argued that such rights extend not only through the natural methods of conception but also through various developments in medical science that help in realizing the right of reproduction, such as assisted reproductive technologies and surrogacy.

She pointed out that section 2(1)(s) of the surrogacy has put a bar on unmarried women to avail the benefits under the surrogacy act, but the same has been allowed for divorced or widowed women.

She said that such a provision highlights arbitrariness and irrationality since in all these cases, the woman will be a single mother.

These provisions violate the right to reproduction, the family right, and the right to privacy, which are the fundamental facets under Article 21 of the Indian constitution.

A challenge was also raised in section 2(1)(zg) and paragraph 1(d)(ii) of form 2 of the surrogacy rules of 2022, whereby the use of donor eggs by a single woman has been prohibited and she has to use only the self-eggs.

It was highlighted that this is a violation of the right to a meaningful family life of the woman.

Case Title:- Neha Nagpal alias Neeha Nagpal vs. Union of India and ors. W.P (C ) No. 1316/2023

Written By– Shianjany Pradhan (@SHIANJANYPRADHAN)

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

High Court

It was opined by the larger bench that it can be a violation of the fair trial as the accused is presumed innocent until...

High Court

When the presumption is raised under section 113-A, the prosecution must show that there was cruelty and continuous harassment.

High Court

The Calcutta High Court directs the CBI to investigate offensive social media comments about the victim in the RG Kar rape-murder case, with cooperation...

High Court

Madras High Court confirms conviction in sports sexual harassment case, directs a series of protective measures for woman athletes. A safe environment, says the...