Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

SLC Reads

SC directs pay hike for Judicial Officers as per Judicial Pay commission Recommendations from Jan 1, 2016; Arrears to be paid by June 30, 2023

Socio Legal Corp

Last Updated on October 4, 2022 by Administrator

@newsdesk_slc

All India Judges Association v. Union of India & Ors.

SC ordered to implement pay structure as per Second National Judicial Pay Commission.

The bench directed State and Centre to pay arrears within June 30, 2023 with 3 installments;

  1. 25% in 3 months
  2. 25% next 3 months
  3. Balance by June 30, 2023

The court found Judicial Officers are excluded by pay commission. The Centre and State while making pay scale for government servants once in 5-10 yrs did not include Judicial Officers, which the court found it necessary and revised the pay structure.

After reviewing service condition of the district judiciary the court concluded the two pending issues;

  1. Pay scales of subordinate judiciary
  2. Pension/retiral benefit

The judges then revised the pay scale of the Second National Judicial Pay Commission which was constituted by SC in 2017.The court found the State refused to pay the revised pay to all Judicial Officers and Retired because they were not having sufficient funds which is ‘unjust’.

The Apex Court further granted interim relief and directed to pay 30% more than their basic pay including accrued increments for all the Judicial Officers disregarding categories/ranks.

The Chief Justice of India NV Ramana inclined to implement the revised pay scale of 2016 and remarked since it’s already been a delay from 6.5 years.

The top court considered the above facts directed to pay the cash in 3 installments starting off immediately.

The bench included Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justices Krishna Murari and Hima Kohli.

The judges association included the petitioners such as; Senior Advocate Banerji, Purvat Wali Advocates, Ms. Mayuri Raghuvanshi, Advocate-on-record Vyom Raghuvanshi.

Written by,

Shrishyly.V

@siriii_ig

Written By

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Posts

High Court

It was opined by the larger bench that it can be a violation of the fair trial as the accused is presumed innocent until...

High Court

When the presumption is raised under section 113-A, the prosecution must show that there was cruelty and continuous harassment.

High Court

The Calcutta High Court directs the CBI to investigate offensive social media comments about the victim in the RG Kar rape-murder case, with cooperation...

High Court

Madras High Court confirms conviction in sports sexual harassment case, directs a series of protective measures for woman athletes. A safe environment, says the...